Washington, D.C.
In a stunning and inflammatory remark, Democrat Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) compared the work of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Speaking before Congress, Durbin claimed, “There’s only one parallel in history... the internment of 120,000 Japanese Americans during WWII.” His comment ignited outrage among conservatives and many Americans who view the comparison as historically ignorant and morally reckless.
Durbin’s statement wasn’t a slip of the tongue. It was a calculated piece of rhetoric meant to vilify border enforcement and emotionally manipulate public opinion. By equating ICE agents—men and women tasked with upholding federal immigration law—to one of America’s darkest wartime mistakes, Durbin blurred the line between lawful deportation and unconstitutional internment.
The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was a tragic violation of civil liberties, driven by wartime hysteria and racial prejudice. ICE’s mission bears no resemblance. ICE operates under federal law, with judicial oversight and due process, targeting individuals who violate U.S. immigration statutes—many of whom have committed serious crimes beyond illegal entry.
To equate the two is to strip history of its moral gravity. The Japanese internment involved American citizens imprisoned without trial because of their ethnicity. ICE enforces immigration law against non-citizens who have broken the law. These are not parallels; they are opposites.
Durbin’s statement undermines the painful truth of real injustice by weaponizing it for political theater. It insults those who suffered under actual internment and demonizes law enforcement officers doing their duty to protect national sovereignty.
When lawmakers equate lawful border enforcement with historical atrocities, they corrode public trust in the rule of law. The message to ICE agents, many of whom are immigrants themselves, is that they are moral criminals for simply doing their job. This rhetoric fuels hostility, erodes morale, and emboldens those who seek to defy immigration laws altogether.
The Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate immigration, not to slander those who enforce it. The comparison also reveals the moral confusion that dominates much of progressive politics today: a refusal to distinguish between justice and lawlessness, mercy and permissiveness, freedom and anarchy.
America is a nation of compassion, but compassion without borders becomes chaos. Durbin’s words reflect a political class more interested in theatrics than truth, more devoted to signaling virtue than securing the homeland.
Scripture teaches that governing authorities are “God’s servants for your good” (Romans 13:4). To preserve order, nations must enforce their laws. This does not mean cruelty; it means moral clarity. The same God who calls His people to love the stranger also established nations and boundaries for human flourishing (Acts 17:26).
When leaders abandon truth for political advantage, they commit a moral inversion—calling good evil and evil good. Senator Durbin’s comparison does exactly that. By twisting history and undermining justice, he not only disrespects ICE agents but also weakens the moral foundations of lawful authority itself.
America cannot survive if its leaders rewrite history to advance ideology. Immigration enforcement is not internment; law is not cruelty; order is not oppression. The real danger lies not in ICE, but in the demagoguery that destroys our ability to tell the difference.
Durbin’s comments reflect a broader sickness in Washington: the belief that emotional outrage is more powerful than truth. But truth matters. Without it, justice collapses. America’s security and her moral soul depend on leaders who tell the truth, even when it is unpopular.
Login or register to join the conversation.
Join the discussion
0 comments