Seattle’s Millionaire Tax Push Drives Wealth Out, Former Starbucks CEO Leaves Washington

Mar 11, 2026

This is some text inside of a div block.
Image generated by A.I.

Seattle, Washington

A Tax Policy That Signals a Bigger Shift

Washington State lawmakers have pushed forward a controversial new tax targeting high-income residents, and the reaction from the business community has been swift. The proposed “millionaires tax,” which would impose a 9.9% tax on personal income above $1 million, marks a dramatic departure for a state long known for having no income tax.

Almost immediately, critics warned that the policy would trigger an exodus of entrepreneurs, investors, and innovators. That prediction now appears to be unfolding in real time.

After more than four decades in Washington, former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has announced that he is leaving Seattle, relocating his family and private office operations out of the state. While Schultz did not publicly cite the tax proposal as the sole reason for the move, the timing of his departure underscores a broader concern: when government punishes success, successful people often leave.

The Millionaire Tax: A Fundamental Change for Washington

The legislation, known as Senate Bill 6346, would impose a 9.9% tax on household income exceeding $1 million. If enacted, it would begin affecting taxpayers in 2028, with the first tax payments due in 2029. Washington has historically been one of only a handful of states without a personal income tax, relying instead on sales taxes and business taxes to fund government services.

Supporters of the proposal argue that the tax is necessary to create a more “equitable” tax system and to generate revenue for public programs. They claim the measure would impact only the top 0.5% of earners and could help fund social initiatives and tax credits for lower-income residents.

But critics warn that the policy represents the opening door to a broader income-tax regime. History shows that income taxes rarely remain limited to the wealthy. When the federal income tax was first implemented in 1913, fewer than 1% of Americans paid it. Within a generation, it had expanded to the middle class.

Opponents also argue that Washington’s constitution has historically prohibited graduated income taxes, meaning the proposal will almost certainly face legal challenges if it becomes law.

The Schultz Departure: A Warning Sign

Howard Schultz is one of the most recognizable business figures in modern American commerce. After acquiring Starbucks in 1987, he transformed the company into a global brand with tens of thousands of stores worldwide.

Schultz recently announced that he and his wife Sheri are relocating to Florida, purchasing a $44 million penthouse residence in Miami’s Surf Club. His family office operations will also move there, though the Schultz Family Foundation will continue some work in Seattle.

The decision follows a broader trend of high-net-worth individuals leaving high-tax states for places with lower taxes and more business-friendly environments. Florida, Tennessee, and Texas have become major destinations for entrepreneurs and investors seeking relief from rising tax burdens.

For Seattle, Schultz’s move carries symbolic weight. The city built much of its economic identity around companies like Starbucks, Amazon, and Microsoft. When the leaders who helped create that prosperity begin relocating elsewhere, it raises deeper questions about the direction of local economic policy.

A Pattern Seattle Has Seen Before

This is not the first time Seattle has clashed with the business community over taxation. In 2018, city officials passed a controversial “head tax” targeting large employers like Amazon. The policy sparked intense backlash and was repealed within weeks after business leaders warned it would threaten jobs and investment.

More recently, the city enacted the JumpStart payroll tax, aimed at companies with highly paid employees. That tax already places a heavier burden on major employers operating in the region.

The proposed millionaire tax represents the next step in a growing pattern: using targeted taxes on successful companies and individuals as a solution to government spending pressures.

Critics argue that this strategy misunderstands how economic ecosystems work. Cities thrive when they attract capital, talent, and innovation. When those same forces are taxed aggressively, they tend to migrate elsewhere.

The Economic Reality of Mobile Wealth

Modern wealth is remarkably mobile. Entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and executives are not tied to one geographic location the way traditional manufacturing industries once were. In many cases, their businesses operate globally while their personal tax residence can shift with a simple relocation.

That mobility creates a serious challenge for governments attempting to target high earners with narrow taxes. If the tax base consists of only a small fraction of residents, losing even a few hundred of them can significantly reduce expected revenue.

Economists often warn that such taxes produce volatile and unpredictable revenue streams. When the taxpayers being targeted have the ability to move, they frequently do.

The departure of figures like Schultz may therefore represent more than a single personal decision. It could be an early indicator of how the policy will reshape the state’s economic landscape.

What This Means for Seattle’s Future

Seattle’s rise over the past several decades was fueled by innovation, entrepreneurship, and a business climate that attracted global companies. But that environment now appears to be changing.

Supporters of the millionaire tax believe the policy is a necessary step toward economic fairness. Opponents see it as another example of government expanding its reach and discouraging success.

The larger question may not simply be whether the tax passes. The deeper question is whether Washington can maintain its status as a hub for innovation and enterprise while pursuing policies that increasingly target the very people who built that success.

When a city begins losing the builders of its prosperity, the consequences often follow slowly at first. Then suddenly.

References

  • Washington House passes 9.9% ‘millionaires tax’ as business leaders warn of ‘seismic shift’ – GeekWire
  • Washington lawmakers debate 9.9% income tax on millionaires – Washington State Standard
  • Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz leaving Seattle for Miami – New York Post
  • Washington’s millionaire tax proposal and economic impact – Forbes

Photo by June Andrei George on Unsplash

Back
Back

Login or register to join the conversation.

Join the discussion

0 comments

Active Here: 0
Be the first to leave a comment.
Loading gif
Loading
Someone is typing
default image profile
Your comment will appear once approved by a moderator.
No Name
Set
This is the actual comment. It's can be long or short. And must contain only text information.
Edited
default image profile
No Name
Set
This is the actual comment. It's can be long or short. And must contain only text information.
Edited
Load More
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Load More
Loading gif

Related post

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.